Sunday, June 7, 2009

Weddings

Ok so it being June and all, the TV and internet have seemingly been taken over by all things wedding. Also apparently my age is the "marrying" age, and I know like 700 people who are engaged or recently married. So I am feeling bombarded by this topic from all sides, and I would just like to vent about it a little bit.

For starters, STOP asking me when I am going to get married. JUST because I am 24 and have been dating and living with the same guy for close to 3 years does not all of a sudden make this question appropriate to ask. Also it is also none of your business to prod about why we aren't getting married or what have you. Contrary to public belief this is NOT a public issue but is instead an incredibly personal decision that includes no one but me and my boyfriend.

Going off that, to answer another popular question - no I am not saddened by my lack of engagement. My life does not hinder on my marital status, and I am quite happy with where my life and relationship are. While this is no insult to those who are getting married or who want to get married young, please don't assume all of us want that. Just because I'm a woman doesn't mean I'm sitting around waiting to be asked or dream about weddings all day.

Which leads me to more of a general wedding issue I have, the concept that EVERY woman as a little girl dreamed of being a "princess" or having a huge wedding or is obsessed with getting married. This is in fact...not true. While I'm sure many women have thought of this, I for one am not one of them. I do not nor have I ever wished to be a princess or look like a princess, and my fantasy wedding would quite frankly be an elopement. The big frou-frou wedding has never appealed to me, and I find the fact that you are expected to spend thousands upon thousands of dollars on this event atrocious. If I'm about to start my life with someone, I can think of many MANY better things to spend that money on instead of a large party (a house for example).

And this leads me to various wedding "traditions." While I am not about to knock traditions, I feel that doing something traditional for the sake of tradition is not advisable. So I'm going to list some of the wedding traditions I just do not agree with:

1) The white dress - now as we all know, in most European cultures the white dress represents virginity. And as many of us ALSO know, not every bride who wears a white dress is a virgin O.o! So while I don't think there is anything wrong with wearing a white dress, I don't think it's something brides should be judged on. Non-virgin brides, feel free to wear the whitest of white dresses if you should so desire. Also, if you don't want to wear white...don't! I no longer see the point of this tradition beyond the bride simply WANTING to wear it. There's no harm in wanting or wearing a colored dress.

2) The engagement - This whole part i have a couple of traditions I am not a fan of. First off, the ring itself. I do not prescribe to the "it must be 10% of his annual salary" mentality. I think placing ANY sort of price limitation on the ring is in essence saying that the man is "buying" the woman and he must ask some sort of minimal price in order to obtain her. Ladies ask yourself...is that really the message you want to send out? Now this is not to say that men should feel free to go to Claire's and get some sort of costume jewelry ring. The ring IS supposed to last a lifetime so it should be of high quality which means it's certainly not going to come cheap, but again the price really shouldn't be the focus. I feel the ring SHOULD be representative of how he feels for her, but that in and of itself doesn't mean he has to break the bank to buy it. I would much prefer getting a ring that fits my personality and style and shows that my man knows what I like and have it be relatively inexpensive, than get some multi-thousand dollar ring that I don't even want to wear.

Secondly, why should men have to propose? I know this has been attacked in a lot of pop culture, but i just want to throw my support behind this. While I see no problem with men proposing, I think the belief that the man HAS to propose is archaic and unnecessary.

Thirdly, asking the father for permission (this would be in the tradition man-asks-woman scenario, though i suppose could translate to the woman asking the man's parents for permission). No offense to dads out there, but you do not own your daughters nor are you in control of their actions, so really there is no need to ask you for anything. I honestly feel to do so is an insult to the woman herself - does she belong to her father? Is she being passed from him to the soon-to-be-husband? Can she not think for herself? I mean honestly, I believe our society has moved past this.

3) The "giving away" of the bride - in the same vein of the last issue I had, the woman doesn't belong to anyone. Now this tradition is expressed anywhere the father just handing his daughter's hand to the groom to the pastor (or whatever person is overseeing the wedding ceremony) asking "who gives this bride away?" and the father responding that he does. Again, she is her own person and should not be given or handed off from one man to another. This is NOT to be against the walking down the aisle, but I see no reason why the woman can't independently walk from her father (or whoever walks her down, doesn't HAVE to be her father) to the groom. I actually think that it is important that she do that - it symbolizes she is making the decision for herself; that she CHOOSES to marry this man and is not in anyway being made to do it. After all gentlemen...isn't that what you want? A woman who CHOOSES you of her own volition and isn't being persuaded by shiny metal and stones or insistent parents?

4) The garter removal - I'm sorry but ew? The groom going under the bride's gown to retrieve some lingerie with his teeth to then show to a crowd? A crowd that happens to consist mostly of your FAMILY? What parent wants to see their children like that, and what children want to have this type of experience in front of their parents, let alone other relatives?

5) The clinking of glasses to make the couple kiss - Umm...I am not some performing monkey here to entertain you. I'll kiss my new hubby when I feel like it, not when you demand it.

6) The vows - now here I do proceed with caution. Why I absolutely feel that a couple should say vows that mean something to THEM and not just say the traditional vows as written for the sake of them being traditional, i also don't feel every couple should write their own vows JUST to be special. You love each other and that's wonderful, that doesn't mean you are capable of expressing your love in words that would merit being proclaimed in front of all of your family. Think of that bad poetry you wrote in high school...would you get up and recite that in front of a crowd? Yea...I didn't think so. So I think if you want to write your own vows, if you as a couple are so moved to do so, then that's great. However unless one or both of you are actually writers...I would seek outside help with the phrasing.

And possibly one of the biggest trends with weddings that I absolutely cannot handle and part of what makes me just want to elope, is the concept that the day is ALL about the bride. It's whatever SHE wants. I'm sorry...but are there not two people getting married? Isn't the whole point of this ceremony the commitment of two people? So newsflash all brides and wedding planners - the day is NOT solely about the woman. It is in fact about the couple. And going off of that...it's about the couple's families. The entire reason this event has to be some huge extravaganza is because your families and friends come. Well why do they come? Yes partly to share in your love and celebration, but also because they themselves symbolize the meshing of your lives together; of becoming part of each other's families. So the day is also about your family. This means couple you absolutely should take your family into account when planning the location of your wedding, or the menu, or time of year. Having an all meat menu when 6 of your cousins are vegans, or planning your special day on a major travel holiday thus making your entire family spend double what it would normally cost to travel to your wedding, etc, is really just disrespectful and encouraging people to not come. Think about it, this is your "special" day; do you really want half the people there upset or unhappy they are there?

In summary, this is an event that is special for the couple. It should involve both of them, it should be about both of them, and the decision of when and how should be left up to them. Any other way to do it, such as following traditions one doesn't agree with or even understand or being pressured into it, are just bad and are, in my opinion a recipe for disaster.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

George Onorato is against SSM

So this was passed to me from someone who wishes to remain nameless. They wrote their state Senator, George Onorato of Queens NY, to express their views on the same sex marriage issue now facing NYS. Here's the reply:

Thank you for your recent email expressing your support for same sex marriage. As you may be aware, although I have met with a number of marriage equality advocates in Albany as well as the district, I am not in support of the same sex marriage bill. Throughout my career in the Senate, I have supported many initiatives of importance to the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community, including the Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Act (SONDA) and New York's hate crimes law.

I am also in favor of the Dignity for All Students Act and the Gender Expression Non-Discrimination Act (GENDA). In addition, I have secured funding for groups in my district serving the LGBT community and providing assistance for people with HIV and AIDS.

I sincerely respect your views, and I appreciate the time you took to express your opinion on this issue. Thank you again for contacting me.


Now - I have an issue with this for several reasons. First and foremost, it just seems callous and ridiculous to say that you support GLBT rights in all these ways and use that as some sort of excuse to not support SSM. Why don't you support SSM? You simply said you don't, in spite having met many leaders in Albany, and then went on to describe how much good you've done for their community. You know what would be good? Knowing why you don't support SSM. Ya know...actually addressing the issue at hand instead of patting yourself on the back.

Second of all - elected officials are called "representatives." Why? Because we have a representative democracy. Well what does that mean? It means that those we elect represent us (key phrase) in government as a direct democracy is not possible. In other words, they are voting based on what their constituency (the people they represent) believe. Furthermore with the birth of professional politicians (people who do this for a living) we have come to hold our politicians as relative experts of the law as they study it and make it. So they have 2 jobs - represent your constituency and uphold the law. So in the justification of supporting or not supporting a piece of legislation i don't believe it's too unreasonable to expect that an explanation be given for said support or lack there of, in terms of what the constituency thinks and what the law says.

I for one would be very interested to know what Queens, NY thinks about this issue. Also I'd like to know how he got such information. Also I'd love to know his legal justification for not supporting this bill.

So George Onorato...what's your reasons?

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Current Songs that Annoy me

Ah...Ms. Jordin Sparks - we meet again. I like her I do. I think she has a great voice, she's cute as a button, all the makings of a great pop star. but the songs she chooses...why?! Why do you do this? You don't have a choice right? It's all American Idol's fault right? Please tell me it is...

I present the latest mishap - "One Step At A Time"

Hurry up and wait
So close, but so far away
Everything that you've always dreamed of
Close enough for you to taste
But you just can't touch

You wanna show the world, but no one knows your name yet
Wonder when and where and how you're gonna make it
You know you can if you get the chance
In your face as the door keeps slamming
Now you're feeling more and more frustrated
And you're getting all kind of impatient waiting

[Chorus:]
We live and we learn to take
One step at a time
There's no need to rush
It's like learning to fly
Or falling in love
It's gonna happen and it's
Supposed to happen that we
Find the reasons why
One step at a time

You believe and you doubt
You're confused, you got it all figured out
Everything that you always wished for
Could be yours, should be yours, would be yours
If they only knew

You wanna show the world, but no one knows your name yet
Wonder when and where and how you're gonna make it
You know you can if you get the chance
In your face as the door keeps slamming
Now you're feeling more and more frustrated
And you're getting all kind of impatient waiting

[Chorus]

When you can't wait any longer
But there's no end in sight
when you need to find the strength
It's the faith that makes you stronger
The only way you get there
Is one step at a time

[Chorus x2]


******

first of all - this is just so sappy and sweet, i think i may have developed a toothache from hearing it so much on the radio. yay we can do whatever we set our minds to, and everything happens for a reason, and blah blah blah thank you Ms. Afternoon Special.

Secondly - the weird speed up during the verses, bugs me. It's all melodious, and then like triple time for the second half of the verse. Why? What is the point of this? To make it sound "hipper?" b/c really it just makes it more difficult to understand what the lyrics are. Though here i have to commend her - Jordin has GREAT diction.

and finally - my biggest issue. As some of you know - I'm a big fan of lyrics, that's how I judge songs. And like i've said, this is just kind of sappy. But the "it's like learning to fly, or falling in love, it's gonna happen..."

I'm sorry but what? How is learning to fly like falling in love? I mean if you're talking about flight by your own volition - that's not even possible. So in that way it's not like falling in love at all b/c it's not even possible whereas falling in love is. If you're talking about learning to fly a plane...that also isn't really like falling in love. It takes a lot of study, education, and practice - last i checked falling in love didn't require those things. So I'm inclined to believe she was inferring the former, which is still ridiculous because we don't fly! Also the "it's gonna happen" bit - no, it doesn't. First of all, there are people who don't fall in love, so that's just ostracizing those people. And the flying thing doesn't work here either, b/c either it's impossible or it takes an incredible amount of work - either way it doesn't just happen.

So like "Tattoo" - this is just a sappy song trying to play on the heartstrings of tweens, and just be a "feel good" song. I don't have anything against "feel good" songs - i really don't. but just do it well! Make it make sense, make it more relatable, not so vague with the "just take one step at a time."

Best of luck to choosing better songs in the future - i hope to hear some good stuff from her, b/c i do truly like her voice.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Remember September 11th


A flag of honor, a flag for reflection
It stands for us all uniting this nation.
It will keep in our minds this tragic day,
Memories of such heroic acts shall not go away.

As we look on this flag of cloth and thread,
A field of bright red for the blood that was shed.
Not just on this day of lasting memories,
But for lives that were given throught history.

Two towers of strength that rose up so high,
Reaching for dreams, they stretched to the sky.
They lay now in ruin at the hands of hate,
Great symbols of our nation have met this fate.

Out nation's military housed in a fortress of steel;
We're reminded this day that war is so real.
Hitting the heart of our power and might,
Rise up America, this terror we must fight!

Stars that shine on a field of bright blue,
Remind us of heroes with hearts so true.
An ordinary day, it had started out to be,
Soon their lives would be given for you and me.

A circle is drawn to stand for our nation's unity,
A nation coming together through such tragedy.
A reminder is given for all of America to see,
That our freedom is never really free.

"God Bless America" is written in white,
Make this your prayer each and every night.
God is always with us, He knows our needs
Bring America back to God, should be our decree.

Much was given, many were lost on this day,
A man of terror tried to take our spirit away.
Do not let our new found spirit and unity fade,
As you look on this flag, remember this day ...

9-11-01

© Lt. Tom Robinson
Wilmington, NC Firefighter

http://suzanvitti.org/poems.html

Saturday, September 6, 2008

There's nothing rebellious about "purity"

Stolen from: http://feministing.com/archives/008216.html

puritycross.jpg I'm getting pretty sick and tired of antiquated notions of chastity and purity being touted as "revolutionary." I'm sorry, folks--there's nothing cutting edge about believing that girls' moral compass resides somewhere in between her legs.

In a recent Chicago Tribune piece on purity balls, reporter Dahleen Glanton refers to girls promising their virginities to their dads and dressing "modestly" as "controversial," a "movement" and "counterculture."

If girls and women really want to rebel against the sexified pop culture that breeds Britney Spears and The Pussycat Dolls, purity balls aren't the way. In fact, they're just more of the same. Pop culture tells women that their bodies are public property and that they have to be sexual in order to be desirable and loved. Purity balls and the like tell women that their bodies are private property (though not our own of course--our bodies belong to our fathers, husbands, and the men in our life) and that they have to be virginal in order to be desirable and loved. In either case women's sexuality belongs to everyone but women. There's nothing counter-cultural or cutting edge about that.

Glanton puts a couple of feminist quotes in her article, but seems to really buy into the notion that purity balls are revolutionary. Hell, she doesn't even seem to question that all of this moral tsk-tsking is directed only at women.

"Girls are going into marriage with 12 sexual relationships. That brings so much baggage and regret that it breaks down the marriage," said Janet Hellige, a volunteer who organizes the biannual Father-Daughter Purity Ball sponsored by The Christian Center in Peoria. "Girls have a wonderful gift to give, and we don't want them to give all of themselves away. What we want them to do is present themselves as a rose to their husband with no blemishes."

Now if that sentiment doesn't make you want to start a revolution, I don't know what will! (Ugh.)

Interestingly, it seems that the purity ball folks are starting to recognize how, well...creepy people are finding these events.

Randy Wilson, who with his wife, Lisa, founded Generations of Light, the Christian ministry in Colorado Springs that held the nation's first purity ball almost a decade ago, said he never intended to start a trend to promote abstinence, though he is pleased if girls decide to take that route on her own.

"This was birthed out of our home, not the abstinence movement," said Wilson, who has five daughters and two sons. "It is a fatherhood event, not a virginity or abstinence event. We don't think it's appropriate to put that weight on the daughter's shoulders."

Oh really? That must be why Wilson had his adolescent daughters pledge their virginities to him and why he gives them a charm necklace with a tiny lock and key--he keeps the key until he can one day give it to his daughter's husband. Yeah, that's not about virginity or ownership at all.

Now, I know I've been accused of being anti-abstinence so I want to make something clear: I'm all for abstaining if that's what a gal wants to do. Obviously. But if young women are not having sex because they think they'll be damaged goods, dirty, and "blemished" otherwise--well, then that's pretty fucking problematic.

As is purity proponents calling themselves counterculture and revolutionary. The pop culture image of women and sexuality is gross, and it is likely to have girls seeking an alternative. But an alternative that judges women just as much (if not more) on their sexuality isn't really an option. A real rebellion would be teaching young women that their sexuality is their own, and that their ability to be a moral person is based on their compassion, kindness, ethics and judgment--not their hymen.

Pic stolen from yet another creepy purity ball site.


More articles about "purity balls" and the new "chaste" America...

http://feministing.com/archives/008216.html


Thursday, June 12, 2008

People that Annoy Me: Idiots who don't know when to pay attention

Sudoku Addicts Halt Drugs Trial



Wed Jun 11, 10:20 AM ET SYDNEY (Reuters) -
An Australian drugs trial lasting more than three months and costing taxpayers over A$1 million ($947,000) has been aborted after a number of jurors were found to have spent up to half the time playing Sudoku puzzles.

Sydney District Court Judge Peter Zahra cancelled the trial of two men on drugs conspiracy charges after the jury foreperson admitted that four to five jurors had been playing the addictive number sequence game, local media reported. The judge was alerted after some of the jurors were observed writing their notes vertically, rather than horizontally. The game involves completing a grid of numbers in the correct sequence.

One juror said the game helped them to pay more attention by keeping their mind busy.

"Some of the evidence is rather drawn out and I find it difficult to maintain my attention the whole time," the juror was quoted saying by the Australian Associated Press.

A new trial is expected to begin in a few weeks once a new jury has been called.

(Reporting by James Thornhill; Editing by Alex Richardson)


How does this happen?! I mean how are you so detached from what is important in society and from any concept of civic responsibility that you would risk drug dealers beating the charge, and that you would waste thousands of tax payers dollars for sake of playing a logic game instead of paying attention?

A co-worker of mine who is 35 didn't know how to reschedule jury duty. And then my boss had to give a 45 minute lecture on how the government works to the people in my office. Mind you I'm the youngest at 23. HOW DO YOU GET THROUGH LIFE NOT KNOWING THIS?!?! Furthermore how is this ignorance and lack of responsibility tolerated by society?

I love sudoku as much as the next person, but how do you let something so unimportant dominate your life to the point that you cannot perform your basic duties as a citizen?


Good grief people annoy me, honestly...

Sunday, June 8, 2008

People that Annoy me - Children's Rights


I’m a little riled up here. I’m sitting at the Y talking to a man about his sick child. And seriously this story is sad – the child was born with a heart condition, and at 1 went in for surgery. It appears the anesthesiologist screwed up and now the child has brain damage and was in a coma for 3 weeks. Now the hospitals, Child Medical Services and Insurance companies are just giving this poor family the run around. It’s truly a sad sad story.
So I responded to the man, “See it’s situations like this that inspire me to be a children’s rights advocate.” And then proceeded to tell him and another man who was listening, a story about a childhood friend I had that was being abused and no one would listen to her. And these two men are like

“Well hold up hold up, I mean sometimes a kid needs a good spanking. You can’t go crying abuse all the time.”

“Maybe the girl was just mad at her parents and injured herself, or just made it all up when she called.”

“You can’t just take kids at their word, they often lie. You need proof.”

So I turn to the man with the sick child who was saying all this, and say “well I have no proof of your story. Should I not believe you? You’re having trouble getting your child’s records (hospital has been altering them and refusing to give them out he says), so where is YOUR proof any of this has happened?”
“Oh well that’s different! I’m telling the truth! Why would I lie about my child?”

I swear to God I could have strangled him. We went back and forth for a little while, and after I divulged almost ALL the details of the story, he’s like “well I suppose that was abuse then.” Here he expects everyone to feel bad for his case, and sings the “how can people do this to children?” song – but he only means for HIS child. And that’s the problem in this country! That the people WE know are the exceptions to our perceptions. All children are noisy snotty little brats, except for the kids I know. The kids I know are angels.

How have we as a culture gotten so against children? Let’s say my 11 year old friend DID throw herself down the stairs, not her parents. Are you saying child services should NOT look into a family where parents have so little control over their child that she is throwing herself down the stairs for attention? No, it’s not the parents fault, it’s the child’s fault. That’s what these two men were saying!

“You can’t blame the parents for the child! She did it to herself.”

YOU ARE THEIR PARENTS!!!!! You are in charge of their upbringing, and well being! Who the hell should I blame for this if not the parents?! Whose fault could it possibly be other than theirs? It’s the 11 year olds fault? This cold calculating 11 year old plotted

“I’ll show my parents, I’ll injure myself for years, and then run away at 16…THAT will show them.”

You’ve got to be kidding me!!! Have you met children? People in this country are so obsessed with absolving themselves from guilt that we have gone to blaming children for the abuse they receive. It’s not the parents who raised them, who taught them everything they know – it’s the child! The child is inherently bad, a bad egg. The child is doing this to their parents.

WHAT?!?! How evil and twisted do you have to be on the inside to think this? I just do not understand at all, and it just makes me lose my faith in humanity even more. Good God…America is going to hell in a hand basket.